English Translation of Authorization Charter

Official Copy

Amtsgericht Luckenwalde

Decision

In the action

of the Sealand Trade Corporation as state-owned property of the Principality of Sealand

so titled and represented by

Johanns W. F. Seiger

Ahrensdorfers Str. 7, 14959 Löwendorf/Trebbin

Plaintiff

against

e.dis Energie Nord AG

represented by the Board, this represented by its Chairman

Dr. Rainer Peters

Langewahler Straße 60, 15517 Fürstenwalde/Spree

Defendant

I. The petition to hand down a provisional injunction is rejected.

II. The cost of the proceedings is to be born by the plaintiff J. W. F. Seiger.

Reasons

I. The plaintiff requests legal protection under its caption against an announced stop of delivery of electric power.

II. The petition is inadmissible and is therefore rejected.
The plaintiff is not capable of being a party to legal proceedings needed for filing an application.

  1. A legal form “Corporation” is alien to German law and is not recognised here.
  2. A Principality of Sealand is not existent within the area of application of the German Basic Law (Grundgesetz) and International Law – Art. 25 GG – and thus unremarkable. A company of this Principality – of whatever nature – is thus not existent and unremarkable.
  3. Thus the Plaintiff is not existent within the area of application of the German basic Law and thus also (not existent) for today’s proceedings; a non-existent person, however, cannot file – not even as representative – effective legal procedures like the request to hand down a provisional injunction. The ineffective filing of the application makes the demand inadmissible.

III. The liability to pay costs follows from the initiator principle inherent in the ZPO (German Code of Civil Procedure) and here is applicable in first place to the acting J. W. F. Seiger. The absence of a capacity to sue and be sued is known to the representative from a large number of proceedings – known to this court, especially since he is counselled by R. Hülshorst – a former lawyer know to the court.

IV. Decision: Amount in dispute: 1500 EUR, §§ 3 ZPO, 12, 20 GKG.

V.  To the acting person J. W. F. Seiger we will point out the following for the present and future proceedings:

The Court is cognisant of the legal conception there concerning the situation in Germany. Especially is known the participation in the on-going negation of the existence and legality of the constituted state and legal order in the joining area and in the existent federal area including the intimidation attempts resulting therefrom. This happens under continuing use of the term “Principality of Sealand” including all resulting modifications, deductions etc.

Any remittance of documents to this Court by using the term “Principality of Sealand” including all deductions, modifications, references etc. will in future be regarded as disrespect and insult of the Court; these documents will be treated accordingly, if applicable be handed back to you for rescission of the disrespect/insult.

pdfklein Original Document